James M. Kelly

James Kelly, Daniel Denny, and John Richards, all single men working as glassblowers, probably at the Aetna Glass Works, went out drinking in their Lawrenceville neighborhood on October 7, 1857. After stopping at a few taverns, Kelly suggested that they go to the nearby home of Wilhelmina Weissman, whom Kelly described as a prostitute.

image001

Weissman lived with her elderly father, Henry, in a dilapidated home on the estate of Philip Winebiddle, a wealthy landowner who allowed the Weissmans to live free of charge.

IMG_1015 (3)

Scion of a prominent founding family with significant landholdings in East Pittsburgh, as a young man Philip Winebiddle killed an unnamed enslaved man and fled efforts to arrest him. He was later tried for murder and “acquitted after a tedious trial of fifteen hours.”

image001Pittsburgh Weekly Gazette, November 19, 1816

When no one answered the door at the Weissman residence that evening, Kelly, Denny, and Richards let themselves in and went to the bedroom where Wilhelmina and Henry slept. Awakened by the intruders, Henry fought the men while Wilhelmina ran for help. When she returned, she found her father had been seriously injured. Henry Weissman died the next day. Richards, Denny, and Kelly were arrested on October 8.

image001
Baltimore Sun, October 10, 1857

Kelly, 20-years old and single, was tried first; his trial began on January 12, 1858. At trial, he claimed that Weissman was a prostitute he had patronized previously and that he and his friends were merely interested customers when they were forced to defend themselves.

After a defense that emphasized Wilhelmina Weissman’s bad character and sexual immorality (including claims that she was pregnant, unmarried, and syphlitic), Kelly was convicted of first-degree murder on January 16. After his motion for a new trial was rejected, he was sentenced to death on March 9, 1858. Denny was convicted of manslaughter and Richards was acquitted.

At the time of Kelly’s original trial, Fife, Jones, Stewart, and Lutz were awaiting execution. The Pittsburgh Gazette of January 18, 1858, wrote “Our jail has never presented such a spectacle to the eyes of the world as at present and we trust it never may present such an one again.” On the same day, the Daily Post wrote “We blush to record the dreadful tragedies for which the community now stands resposible (sic). Fife, Charlotte Jones, Stewart, Lutz and Kelly, with the dismal prospects of others being added to the column. We have no heart to enter upon the discussion of the causes of this fearful increase of the devilish spirit of murder; neither do we desire to reiterate the horrible details of this terrible result. It is enough to contemplate that cold-blooded murder – a total disregard of the value of human life, has been considered a trifle in this region, by bullies and street corner ruffians.”

image001
Pittsburgh Post, January 18, 1858

On appeal, on July 15, 1858, Kelly’s conviction was reversed and he was granted a new trial (Kelly v. Commonwealth, 1 Grant 484, 1858). The reversal was granted due to the court’s concern that the circumstances of the offense mitigated Kelly’s premeditation, raised the issue of self-defense, and, in the absence of a clear intent to rape, did not rise to the level of first-degree murder. Specifically, Kelly had been charged with felony (rape) murder, yet his intent to rape had not been established and could not be used as a component of the charge if Wilhelmina had fled before the killing occurred.

Kelly’s second trial began on November 30, 1858. He was convicted of second-degree murder on December 2, 1858, and sentenced to eight years and nine months in Western Penitentiary.* After serving all of that sentence, Kelly was discharged on September 2, 1867. He died in Pittsburgh in 1914.

image001
Pittsburgh Daily Post, December 3, 1858

Wilhelmina Weissman died in Allegheny General Hospital on May 8, 1899.

* Kelly was the first death-sentenced defendant to serve time in Western Penitentiary. By the time he arrived, the famed Western Pen, a once-promising testimony to the failed belief that prisons could serve as beacons of “moral architecture,” was already on its second (of three) iterations. The idealism surrounding prisons at the time was one reason that the death penalty was not used more frequently. That most murderers were young white men of Northern and Western European ancestry was another important moderating factor. Only two (Jewell and Fitzpatrick) of the thirteen (Honeyman, Moode, Dunn, Lutz, Kelly, Keenan, Lynch, Murray, Meyers, Linkner, Abernathy) white men sentenced to death for fatal assaults involving white victims before the late 1800s were executed. Sounding this note, the Pittsburgh Daily Post in 1858 also wrote that “the humanity of the age forbids [making] the laws more stringent” before concluding that “the best defense is not punishment but prevention.” As the profile of the offender changing later in the century, use of the death penalty increases accordingly.

Martin Weinberger

In a remarkable reprise of the Frecke and Marschall, Myers and Murray, and Linkner cases, all recent felony murders of recent German immigrants by their countrymen, Martin Weinberger killed Louis Gotfreund on June 16, 1882. His nude and decomposing body was found in the bushes on the side of the road two days later.

image001

Weinberger and Gotfreund, German Jewish immigrants working as peddlers or “roving junk dealers,” as was common among German immigrants at the time, were traveling in a remote area near Sewickley when Weinberger robbed and shot Gotfreund and fled with his horse and wagon, goods, and cash. Gotfreund, newly arrived and unmarried, was not identified until ten days later, when an uncle living in East Liverpool, Ohio, responded to a newspaper description of the victim and was able to identify his exhumed body.

image001
Pittsburgh Daily Post, June 30, 1882

Based on descriptions provided by witnesses, Weinberger was arrested on July 1, 1882. By that time, the stolen goods had been sold and the money deposited in a bank account in Youngstown. He claimed that Gotfreund had committed suicide and that he tried to conceal the act by removing Gotfreund’s clothes and hiding his body.

With a strong evidentiary case against Weinberger and an “exceedingly weak” (Pittsburgh Commercial Gazette, January 6, 1883) and implausible defense, Weinberger was convicted of first-degree murder on January 6, 1883.

After a lengthy delay caused by the efforts of Hungarian authorities, friends, and family to prevent Weinberger’s execution, he was hanged on September 2, 1884, after having confessed from the gallows.

image001
Pittsburgh Commercial Gazette, September 3, 1884

Martin Weinberger is believed to be the first Jewish person executed in Pennsylvania.

image001
Pittsburgh Press, September 2, 1884

Robert Warden McConkey

Robert McConkey was part of a gang that robbed Hendrickson & McClure’s Hardware in McKeesport, on July 31, 1881, stealing a large and valuable cache of knives and guns. Two days later, store owners George A. McClure and Wilbert Hendrickson, as well as Joseph Lynch and George Fleming, traced the gang to a bend on the Monongahela River known as Dead Man’s Hollow, near where Fife and Jones had committed double murder nearly twenty-five years earlier.

image001

When they confronted the gang, McConkey, only 19 years old and already with a criminal record, shot and killed McClure. He and his accomplices then fled. A sizable reward was offered for their capture. Reports that they would be lynched were widespread.

image001
Pittsburgh Daily Post, August 3, 1881

Months later, in January 1882, McConkey was found in jail in Little Valley, Cattaraugus County, New York, where he was serving time for theft, and returned to Pittsburgh.

At trial the following month, Hendrickson, Lynch, and Fleming as well as other witnesses identified McConkey as McClure’s killer. His defense, that this was a case of mistaken identity, failed. McConkey, poor, fatherless, illiterate – “[f]ew persons raised in this country of free schools know less,” remarked the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette – and already well down a wayward path, was convicted of first-degree murder on February 15, 1882. His motion for a new trial was rejected and he was sentenced to death on February 25.

image001
Pittsburgh Daily Post, February 16, 1882

McConkey’s appeal, which challenged the veracity of the witnesses and raised a series of technical points, was likewise rejected (McConkey v. Commonwealth, 101 Pa. 416, 1882).

In the days before his execution, newspaper accounts expressed sympathy for McConkey’s youth, his quiet demeanor, and his many disadvantages.

Ward McConkey was executed on May 10, 1883. Due to the unusually high level of public interest created by both the notoriety of the case and the compassion shown to the young white killer, a large fence was erected around the jailyard to obstruct the view of onlookers.

Described as a model prisoner, brave all the way to the gallows, McConkey declared his innocence to the end. His final words were “Good-Bye, murderers.”

About the execution, the Pittsburgh Daily Post wrote: “The moral effect of the execution on the criminal class or those whose steps are verging toward criminality may be safely placed at about zero….We doubt if it has any, or is anything else than the vengeance of society….One valid reason is left…the protection of society. This is tangible ground and one can understand it. McConkey will murder no more. That much has been accomplished by the execution. As a deterrent power on the criminal class we doubt the efficacy of the gallows. There is too long an interval between the crime and the penalty, to say nothing of the uncertainty of the punishment….”

Though the case remained in the news for years with reports of sightings of McConkey’s accomplices, no other arrests were ever made.

Dead Man’s Hollow is now a designated conservation area protected by the Allegheny Land Trust, though its reputation for mystery and violence remains.

image001
Flickr/Kordite

William Murray and Frederick Myers

On the evening of November 11, 1874, German-immigrant Frederick Myers and his companion, William Murray, robbed and shot German immigrant Gotthard Wahl in a remote area north of Pittsburgh. Like Frecke and Marschall before them, the companions who had reportedly come to Pittsburgh only days earlier, made their livings through crime. Like Foerster, Wahl, a father of seven, was chosen because he was traveling on an isolated road near Perrysville and appeared to be a man of some means.

image001
Pittsburgh, 1876

Murray, the leader of the two, fired the fatal shot. Wahl died the next day. A man named Jacobs, who was traveling with Wahl, was injured but able to escape. Both victims were able to provide descriptions of their assailants.

After returning to their room at Mrs. Moore’s boardinghouse, 208 Third Avenue, Mary Kearns, an employee there who had heard of the killing, became suspicious of Murray and Myers and alerted authorities.

They were arrested on November 14.

image002
Pittsburgh Post, November 21, 1874

Murray and Myers were convicted in separate trials in March 1875, and sentenced to death.  Though there was some surprise that Myers was convicted of first-degree murder despite his secondary role in the case, their convictions were sustained on appeal (Myers and Murray v. Commonwealth, 79 Pa. 308, 1875).

image001
Pittsburgh Post, March 27, 1875

William Murray and Frederick Myers were executed on January 6, 1876, before a reported crowd of 500 people, said to have been the largest crowd ever to see a nominally private execution inside the jail. Murray is reported to have suffered a slow and lingering death twenty minutes after the trap was sprung.

image001

Anthony James Fiebiger

Anthony Fiebiger was arrested on May 23, 1998, on drunk and disorderly charges. At the time of his arrest, he was living in a Goodwill treatment center and receiving alcohol abuse treatment.

Once in custody, he was questioned by police about the February 28, 1989, disappearance of his former girlfriend, Norma C. Parker, who was twenty years his senior. Fiebiger and Parker had lived together in Carnegie at the time and he had long been a suspect in her disappearance.

image001
Pittsburgh Press, March 19, 1989

Putting up little resistance, Fiebiger confessed to police that he had strangled Parker, put her body in a 55 gallon drum, and buried it in Mingo Park, Washington County. Her body was discovered there by police on May 27, 1998.

image001
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, May 24, 1998

He also confessed to the May 22, 1982 rape and murder of Marcia L. Jones, a teenager from Mt. Washington.

image001
Pittsburgh Press, May 24, 1982

In that case, Fiebiger, who lived in Mt. Washington at the time, said he acted with accomplice Joseph Morton. They set out to find a woman to rape, enticing Jones to join them by offering her marijuana. They then raped and strangled her and left her body in a shallow grave in Grandview Park, where it was discovered that same day.

image001

At trial for killing Jones, Fiebiger, a diagnosed sociopath, was found guilty of first-degree murder on March 1, 1999. The jury deliberated ten minutes before convicting him. He was sentenced to death later the same day. Rejecting the advice of counsel, Fiebiger then pleaded guilty to killing Parker without first obtaining a plea deal. He was sentenced to death in that case on June 30, 1999.

In 2001, Fiebiger ceased all appeals and sought to be executed. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reviewed his cases despite Fiebiger’s wishes, upholding both convictions and death sentences (Commonwealth v. Fiebiger, 570 Pa. 583, 2002).

Anthony Fiebiger died on death row on April 4, 2022.

image001
Anthony Fiebiger, 2015

Joseph Morton is serving a life sentence for his role in the Jones murder.

Fiebiger was also implicated in a 1986 rape on Mt. Washington but was never arrested. He was arrested in 1991 for counterfeiting $20 bills in his work as a printer, for which pleaded guilty and served a 2 1/2 year federal sentence.

Michael Ruminski

Michael Ruminski, a Polish-born steelworker, murdered his wife, Johanna, on the evening of January 28, 1898, in their boardinghouse room at 94 Ohio St. in Allegheny. The killing was the culmination of years of violence that had haunted their relationship.

image001
East Ohio St.

After strangling Johanna, Ruminski set the room on fire in an effort to cover his crime. He then fled the scene and went in to Pittsburgh to stay with friends. When he returned to Allegheny the next day to try to raise enough money to leave town he was recognized and arrested.

Ruminski had been arrested for the death of their son, Leo, in December 1896, and for the attempted murder of Johanna several months prior to their baby’s death. He was not charged in either case. Despite testimony that Ruminski was alone with the child at the time of death, the coroner ruled that the child died of pneumonia. The Ruminski’s were living in Braddock at the time.

image002

At trial for killing his wife, Ruminski gained notoriety and the nickname “the Polish dude” for his insistence on being well-dressed. In a closely watched trial, police testified that Ruminski had two prior arrests for assaulting his wife and had tried on several recent occasions to file a complaint related to his wife’s lack of attention to his care. Neighbors testified to having heard the couple quarrel the night of the murder and to Ruminski’s suspicious behavior the day after the murder.

The strength of the physical evidence and testimony and the weakness of Ruminski’s alibi defense left little doubt that he would be convicted. The jury found him guilty of first-degree murder on November 4, 1898. After his motion for a new trial was rejected, he was sentenced to death on December 3.

On January 17, 1899, Michael Ruminski committed suicide by strangulation in the Allegheny County Jail. His clemency request was still before the Pardon Board.

image002
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, January 18, 1899

Subsequent to Ruminski’s suicide, jail officials began placing prisoners awaiting execution under a death watch.

Henry Fife, Charlotte Jones, and Monroe Stewart

image001

Among the most infamous Allegheny County murders – featuring the first woman to go to the gallows, a wrongful conviction, an unsolved murder, and buried treasure – is the darkly gothic tale of Charlotte Jones, Henry Fife, and Monroe Stewart.

Jones, 25, and Fife, 21, who were romantically tied, conspired to rob Jones’ aunt and uncle of their life savings and use the money to begin their lives together. On April 30, 1857, they did so, stabbing to death George Wilson and Elizabeth McMasters in their log cabin home near Glassport, twelve miles south of Pittsburgh, in the process. The elderly siblings lived modestly and kept their considerable savings in their home.

The assailants stabbed Wilson multiple times and beat McMasters to death with a poker. They are reported to have stolen $600 and buried the money for later retrieval along the bank of the Youghiogheny River.

image001

The next morning, a neighbor found the murdered siblings when she stopped by their home. Suspicion quickly fell on Jones, who had been seen in nearby McKeesport at the same time the bodies were found and was reputed to have been involved with her brother, William, in the March 30 murder of Samuel H. White in Washington County, where she lived. White, who was reported to have had $750 in his home, had been killed under similar circumstances to Wilson and McMasters. Jones and Fife were arrested on May 1.

image001

After her arrest, Jones first blamed her brother. Soon after, she confessed, casting herself and Fife as the unwitting accomplices of Monroe Stewart, a friend and work associate of Fife. Stewart, who had been seen with Fife shortly before the murders, did not approve of Jones. Arrested on that basis, Stewart steadfastly maintained his innocence throughout the ordeal that followed.

In the wake of a sensational and closely followed eleven day trial – the newspaper coverage was nearly stenographic – in the summer of 1857, all three were found guilty on July 11, 1857.

image001image001image001

image001
Pittsburgh Morning Post

They were sentenced to death two weeks later. It was the first felony murder to result in a capital conviction in Allegheny County history. Their convictions were upheld on appeal. Fife and Jones were scheduled to hang on February 12, 1858, with Stewart scheduled to follow on February 26.

image001
Pittsburgh Morning Post, July 27, 1857

In dramatic statements from the gallows on February 12, 1858, Jones and Fife completely absolved Stewart of any involvement in the incident. Fife declared Stewart a friend who had no involvement in the crime. Jones, clearly the mastermind of the crime, acknowledged that she had originally implicated Stewart because she feared he would try to persuade Fife to leave her.

Indicative of the tempered support for the death penalty in that era, as reflected in the regular legislative attempts to abolish its use that were just beginning to wane as civil war loomed, the Pittsburgh Morning Post published a bloodless account of the executions.

image001
Pittsburgh Morning Post, February 13, 1858

Jones and Fife were hanged side-by-side; both hangings were botched, resulting in slow deaths by strangulation. Jones was the first woman, and one of only two women, to be executed in Allegheny County history. She was also the first woman to be executed in Pennsylvania since the controversial 1809 execution of Susanna Cox in Lancaster County; a case that strengthened public sentiment against the capital eligibility of infanticide (see the Allegheny County case of Mary Martin).

image001

Contributing to the true crime murder genre that was so popular in the 19th century, the story of their crime, trial, confessions, and executions was told in a quickly-produced pamphlet.

Monroe Stewart, whose execution was scheduled for the following week, was pardoned on February 22, 1858, making his the first wrongful capital conviction in Allegheny County history.

His freedom was short-lived. While in jail, Stewart had contracted smallpox. He died in Passavant Hospital on March 9, 1858. His death so soon after his pardon came to be seen by some as divine proof of his guilt and was said by others to have been faked by authorities to allow him to leave the area.

image001
Pittsburgh Daily Post, March 10, 1858

In another Gothic twist, the stolen money that Fife was said to have buried was reportedly found in 1880 by boys playing in the area, only to have it quickly stolen from them by a red-headed stranger.

image004

image005
New York Times, June 19, 1880

The murder of Samuel H. White was never solved. Charlotte’s brother, William Jones, Jr., was convicted of the murder on November 23, 1857, but had his conviction overturned in February 1858. He was acquitted at a second trial in May 1858, but back in prison multiple thereafter for a series of violent crimes.

Daniel Werling

In perhaps the most egregious of the many domestic homicides to result in a capital conviction in Allegheny County history, Daniel Werling killed his wife, Barbara, on Saturday, April 7, 1894, shooting her while she worked at the Diamond Market (the present location of Market Square). Werling had just been released from prison for a prior assault on his wife.

image001
Diamond Market

The day he was released, Werling pawned his watch and bought a gun, intent on carrying out his threat to kill his wife. He did so brazenly, approaching her in full view of patrons and peddlers, and shooting her multiple times.

When Werling was apprehended by patrons, he is reported to have said “I had a right to do this. I have cause to do this.” He also said he wanted to kill the market superintendent. Once in custody, he confessed to police.

Records indicate Werling had been imprisoned at least eight times over the previous eight years, always for domestic violence and always for a few months at the Allegheny County Workhouse. The tone of the newspaper coverage indicates his crimes were not taken very seriously.

image003
Pittsburgh Post, June 2, 1890
image001
Pittsburgh Post, May 21, 1891
image001
Pittsburgh Press, December 14, 1891
image005
Pittsburgh Dispatch, October 17, 1892

Barbara (Bock) Werling maintained a stand at the market as a means to support her family during her husband’s frequent periods of incarceration and drunkenness.

At trial, Werling claimed he was insane due to excessive alcohol consumption. After brief jury deliberations, he was convicted of first-degree murder on June 19, 1894, and sentenced to death on June 30.

image001
Pittsburgh Daily Post, June 20, 1894

At the time of his conviction, the Post-Gazette wryly noted: “Evidently the jury in the Werling case reasoned that if a particular type of insanity would lead a man to deliberately plan and execute the murder of his wife; declare he was glad of it repeatedly and wish he had been able to kill another person, the proper treatment for that kind of insanity would be twisted hemp. The community generally will approve the remedy.”

Werling’s execution, originally scheduled for May 7, 1895, was respited while his clemency request, which centered on the claim that the much-advertised (and subsequently discredited) Keeley Cure for alcoholism had rendered Werling insane, was considered. His long history of abuse and the associated evidence of deliberation in that abuse ultimately doomed that argument.

Pittsburg Press, May 3, 1895

His appeal and pardon request rejected, Daniel Werling was hanged on July 9, 1895. A state that could not be aroused to protect the life of Barbara Werling had acted decisively to kill her killer.

Edward J. Coffey

Edward J. Coffey was the ne’er do well son of a middle class Pittsburgh family. Well-read, well-dressed, and well-connected, Coffey spent most of his life on the wrong side of the law.

His criminal record included bank robbery and jewelry store robbery convictions (he was also a confederate of Edgar Frank Small and was widely believed to have been an accomplice in Small’s murder of Nicholas Jacoby).

image001
Sixth Avenue, 1908

Early on the morning of August 4, 1885, weeks after his father’s death and weeks after having been paroled from federal prison on a counterfeiting conviction, Coffey, 30, was involved in an altercation in front of a Sixth St. restaurant.

image001

When Officer John F. “Benjamin” Evans responded, Coffey shot him. Fleeing, he was apprehended after a shoot out with pursuing police. Evans, Irish-born and 31 years old, died on August 6, after providing statements implicating Coffey.

image001
Pittsburgh Daily Post, August 5, 1885

At the time of the shooting, the Post-Gazette described Coffey as “one of those moral monstrosities who delight in law-breaking” (August 5, 1885). At trial, despite representation by the best private counsel available, Coffey was convicted of first-degree murder on November 13, 1885, and sentenced to death. The result caused a great deal of surprise among those who expected his connections to lessen his punishment.

image001
Pittsburgh Daily Post, November 17, 1886

Considerable effort was made to reverse Coffey’s death sentence, including the intercession of his attorney, religious leaders, and prominent Pittsburghers. When his appeal was rejected, the case was carried to the state supreme court, where it was rejected again.

These efforts were able to delay the execution of Coffey’s sentence for several years. Ultimately, though, his appellate and his clemency opportunities were exhausted and his final death warrant was issued for January 18, 1888.

image001

Once it became clear that all legal avenues to saving his own life were foreclosed, Coffey slit his own throat.

The Daily Post wrote, “[b]y one desperate thrust a life was transferred from the scales of justice to those of nature, and there it still hangs, trembling, wavering.” Coffey died on January 24, 1888.

image003
Pittsburgh Post, January 19, 1888

Though John Evans was described at the time as the first Pittsburgh Police officer murdered in the line of duty, my research indicates he was the sixth such officer and the eighth law enforcement official from Allegheny County to be feloniously killed. He was, though, the first officer whose killing resulted in a death sentence.

Frederick Reidel

In a remote section of Lower St. Clair Township, near one of the many coal mines that lined Mount Washington and just beyond the neighborhood formerly known as Birmingham, Frederick Reidel lived wife his wife, Margaret, and their three children and worked as a coal miner.

image001

Digital StillCamera

On Sunday, July 12, 1846, the German-born Reidel, who was out on bail for assault and had a prior assault conviction for stabbing a man, beat Margaret to death with an axe. Confronted by neighbors, he denied responsibility, though his clothes were blood-stained and his six-year old son was a witness. He was promptly arrested.

image003
Pittsburgh Daily Morning Post, July 14, 1846

At trial, neighbors and coworkers testified that Reidel regularly assaulted his wife. The coroner testified about the manner of killing. The bloody axe handle was shown. Reidel’s own testimony, in which he denied any knowledge of the killing and claimed that he was away from home at the time, was effectively countered by challenging his story.

image001
Pittsburgh Daily Gazette and Advertiser, November 19, 1846

Reidel was convicted of first-degree murder on November 18, 1846. He immediately filed a motion for a new trial, claiming the evidence did not support his conviction. Pursuant to that claim, Margaret Reidel’s body was disinterred  in an unsuccessful effort to establish the absence of the wounds allegedly inflicted by her husband.

That motion failed and Reidel was sentenced to death on December 5, 1846. Once sentenced, he again loudly denounced his conviction.

While his counsel pursued post-conviction remedies, The Daily Post remarked “we are strongly inclined to the opinion that the poor devil has got to swing” (March 18, 1847). His history of abuse and the unassailed character of his wife offered Reidel little hope.

His execution was set for April 30, 1847. That morning, Reidel was found dead in his cell. He had extensive cuts on both arms and was hanging by his bedsheet. The Pittsburgh Daily Post headline the next day exclaimed “Frederick Reidel his own executioner!”

image001
Pittsburgh Daily Post, May 1, 1847

Reidel was buried near his brother’s Erie County residence. That brother, George, murdered Joseph Bartanalli in November 1858, for which he served a nine year sentence.

The newspaper story announcing the Reidel murder made reference to another domestic murder on May 19, 1846, in which Robert Beatson was alleged to have killed his wife, Margaret, with an axe in their home on Prospect St., downtown. Despite testimony against him by his daughter, testimony from neighbors who heard Beatson threaten his wife, and statements provided by Margaret implicating her husband before she died, Beatson was acquitted.

The only evident difference in the cases is that Margaret Beatson was identified by friends and neighbors as a frequent and unrepentant drinker, an uncaring mother, and, perhaps, an unfaithful wife (Daily Post, November 26, 1846), apparently unworthy of the full protection of the law. Particularly in an era of such strong temperance sensibilities, the possible role of alcohol in this case was closely considered in the public and legal evaluations of the defendant and the victim.

Like Beatson, the case of Joseph Zimmerlee, who murdered his wife, Maria Anne, on September 11, 1848, provides another example of the considerable social and legal space granted to men who kill their wives. It also illuminates the social and legal space granted to men to redress the sexual abuse of women.

At the time of the killing, which occurred during a drunken argument over money, Zimmerlee was in an advanced state of alcoholism with associated signs of declining mental health.

After a trial in which Zimmerlee’s guilt was not seriously questioned, and which included statements his wife provided to authorities before she died, he was convicted of first-degree murder. In a highly unusual move that prevented Zimmerlee from ever being formally sentenced to death, widespread public and newspaper opposition to the verdict led to an immediate motion for a new trial.

At issue was that Zimmerlee’s daughter had previously been sexually abused by his wife’s brother, after which Zimmerlee, reportedly previously sober and peaceable, became dissolute. Declaring of the verdict that “no event has occurred for years more horrible than the conviction of this miserable and friendless old German” and that “the crimes of the world drove him to madness,” the Pittsburgh Daily Post implored, “Let not the Commonwealth MURDER an insane man” (December 4, 1848).

Whatever the merits of these claims, that his wife was not allowed similar grief or shown any expressions of sympathy is noteworthy. Zimmerlee’s motion was granted in January 1849, and he was convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to twelve years in prison on April 28, 1849.

Consider also the gothic tragedy of the several cases of Mary Delaney. Working as a prostitute in the downtown brothel of Mrs. Criswell, Delaney was stabbed by a patron on October 25, 1851. No arrest was made.

Eighteen months later, on April 9, 1853, Jacob Shaw, a prospective patron, was stabbed  after a quarrel over a pair of stockings escalated into threats. Before dying, he identified Delaney as his assailant.

image001
Pittsburgh Gazette, April 12, 1853

After a trial in which she denied stabbing the abusive Shaw, the jury deliberated a remarkable eight days before convicting Delaney of manslaughter and recommending mercy. Her motion for a new trial, which included statements that a man had confessed to the killing, was rejected. Despite the jury’s recommendation, Delaney was sentenced to three years in prison.

After her release, she married and started a family. On June 24, 1859, Delaney was killed by her husband, Richard Jones, who worked as a constable. The murder was particularly brutal; Delaney was shot, then stabbed and badly disfigured. Jones confessed to fellow authorities that he killed his wife after learning she had returned to her previous employment (New York Times, June 28, 1859).

image001
Pittsburgh Post, June 25, 1859

“Although all of the elements of a higher grade were clearly proven” (Pittsburgh Daily Post, October 1, 1884), Jones was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to six years in prison on February 18, 1860. He was pardoned thirteen months later. At the time of his release, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette noted “the murder was most deliberate and terrible, but owing to the character of the victim, and the peculiar circumstances surrounding the case, Jones had many sympathizers and no one we think will be disposed to grumble at his release” (March 19, 1861).

A final example of the way in which the worst abuses of men are mitigated by the character attributed to their wives involved the murder of Isabella Campbell by her husband, Thomas, on November 7, 1869. The Campbells, a couple of modest means with one child, had been married for several years, during which Thomas regularly and severely beat his wife, a fact that was known to neighbors and authorities.

On the evening of her murder, they were drinking in their home with several others. Apparently believing that Isabella was being too friendly with other men, Thomas became violent and beat his wife repeatedly. The result, as the headlines declared, was a “shocking” and “savage” murder of “unparalleled fiendishness.”

image001
Pittsburgh Daily Post, November 9, 1869

After being arrested, Campbell denied any responsibility, claiming his wife fell down a flight of stairs while running away after he caught her with two other men. He maintained the same story throughout the case, though multiple witnesses testified to hearing, but not seeing, Campbell beat his wife over a lengthy period of time. They did nothing to intervene.

At trial, Campbell was convicted of second-degree murder, a verdict “that occasioned universal surprise in this locality. The gallows has clearly been cheated of its dues in this case. The prisoner deserved the rope as richly as any man who ever stained his hands with the blood of his fellow being, and an outraged public deeply regret that any twelve men could be found so insensitive to evidence, or so ignorant of the law, as to bring in so mild a verdict” (Pittsburgh Weekly Gazette, January 13, 1870).

image001
Pittsburgh Weekly Gazette, January 13, 1870